Armeijakokemusteni own as well as others who visited the military reports that I venture to present

To refuse a hearing to an opinion, Because one is sure That it is false, is to Assume That one's own Certainty is the same thing as absolute Certainty. All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility. - John Stuart Mill -
A little at a time, starting bulletproof with the clues Hyvinkään tragedy unfold. Ammuskelija was a 18-year-old young man who was interested in airsoftaamista and which had suspended their military service bulletproof and who had taken his father's weapons Weapon. It, therefore, for all appearances, was a little childish liipaisinhöperö young man whose square is not the army lasted for so-called. real places - and who had made a rude fantasies come true. The whole thing seems really incomprehensible. What should now be banned? Airsoftaaminen, army or firearms? Airsoftaaminen is the most enthusiasts mostly nice but a little childish pastime. Little boys cap gun-happy bulletproof together, and a little larger plastic ball guns. But in the forests and in the suburbs airsoftpyssyn with the running condition yes to grow. And be sure to airsoftaaminen can be many reservist way to keep fighting skills above. Military conscription is based in Finland, and ruukinmatruuna has already been told on several bulletproof occasions its position on military service. It should be noted that it is indeed a cross-section bulletproof of all Finnish young men, and there is room for all vipeltäjiä: psychopaths, sociopaths, school bullies, thieves, drug users, alcoholics, artichokes, B, fourth chain of men, and all the other people with the encrypted not want to be a civilian in any dealing with. But the fact that a) the reason b) one has to retire from service, is about a man either that he did not simply refuse to be commanded and pompotettavaksi and humiliated, or, alternatively, he can not be solved in groups operating in and obedience to, and ruukinmatruuna interprets that it is this second case. Firearms have historically been free of human rights. Neutral person bulletproof has the right to bear arms. Bond is not. The fact that the state ban gun collection hallintoalamaisiltaan, there is no sign that the state wants to calm the nation and to maintain order. It is a sign that the state treats hallintoalamaisiaan slaves. But there is another side. As long as the Finnish army based on conscription, private firearms is absolutely a necessity. How else can be expected bulletproof of reservists to be able to maintain their marksmanship? None of the bans would not be this much shooters prevented the carrying out its plans. When the arms are derived from the father's gun cabinet, and the father to trust his son, there is nothing to be able to prevent such events. The only reasonable explanation about it is that the boy simply blow up. Why, it remains to be seen in the coming days. Added on May 28, 2012 at 11:47: The shooter has not visited the army and entered the service.
I know what I should probably do; nothing !! Since these can not be nothing, all in all, this happens all the time. Cest la vie. You just have to endure. Or wear a damn hard garments:> On May 28, 2012 at 3:42 AM
We know far too little incident, the perpetrator and the background of the matter is hardly worth very deeply reflect and draw any conclusions / suggestions / etc. The shocking case overall. The issue is really worth considering in general. But incomplete information depends on empowering always involves a risk ... Incorrect designated the lead to wrong outcomes, even though the process is correct. May 28, 2012 at 10:53 AM
Armeijakokemusteni own as well as others who visited the military reports that I venture to present (most likely severely deniable) claim that the so-called. marksmanship to a large extent the intrinsic characteristic that a human has, or not. Consequently, its "maintaining" civilian hunting or target shooting with activities bulletproof such is not necessary. Soldier's basic assault rifle is a very simple device. Basic Skills-handling (downloading, ensure the launching, landing, placement, cleaning, management, control) learns more stupid than one person during the afternoon. Fire support and self-sufficient for the early notification of how to set a hold in your hand, and how as a target. The end is attached to the human natural shooting skills of visual ability, the stability of the hand, nerves, management etc. For the first ten after the shot shows that the soldiers, some are better shooters and some worse. Among them, with the bullets go in the bushes, there will never be good shooters. And those who shoot the ball at the center, are already naturally good shooters. Training does not change bulletproof this configuration in any way. Of course, some improvement can be achieved, particularly if poor performance is due to the fact that the shooter has not figured out something to fire-related things, or he has done something wrong (have been put in the wrong way, etc.). When once I shot a few Sat.