These remarks with a lot of imagination and rigging above picture illustrates a general fear: what

Magazine
Apple unveiled gun control debate its first smartphone integrating a biometric system based on fingerprints of its owner. This innovation occurs in a particular period, with the publication of documents revealing the proximity of Apple and the NSA, who also tries to access all the information possible. Called Touch ID, this feature obviously raises questions ... and fears.
At its fall conference, Apple introduced two new smartphones. One of them, the iPhone 5S, includes an integrated main switch biometric device. This feature opens new perspectives for the user, since the fingerprint fingers replaces the password. He can unlock your mobile, download gun control debate an application from the App Store or iTunes settle a payment by simply placing gun control debate his finger gun control debate on the main button.
"The surface of the button, made of sapphire crystal laser cut, directs the image of your finger to touch sensor reading under the outer layers of your skin to get a detailed impression. Knob itself is surrounded by a stainless steel circle that detects your finger, alarm sensor and improves the signal to noise ratio. The software then reads your fingerprint ridges then finds correspondence to unlock your iPhone. "
Data could not be more personal, fingerprint naturally deserves the best protection. During his keynote, Apple has stated that all biometric data related to the user's gun control debate fingerprint is encrypted and locked in the A7 chip (which should not interfere with the NSA). They are not directly accessible or used by other software on the phone. In addition, they are not hosted on Apple's servers and are not stored in iCloud.
Obviously gun control debate impossible in the present state of affairs to ascertain whether Apple is telling the truth. The ecosystem of American business is closed, no one can actually go check the nature of the treatments that can work on these biometric data ... or if the information remains well locally, that is to say into the phone. In this respect, we must accept to trust Apple. However, the Snowden case and the revelations that followed should encourage the greatest caution.
Concerning the operation of ID Touch, Apple is still very unclear. It is possible that after the initial recording of fingerprints and storing them in the A7 chip, the system generates a kind of signature gun control debate footprint (similar to hash function for passwords) that will then link between the biometric data contained in the chip and some manipulations (unlock, buy, download).
The presentation of Touch ID obviously caused some reactions. On Twitter, Troy Hunt, Software Architect at Microsoft, was so amused to imagine Apple qu'enverrait alert when concern. "Dear user of the iPhone, due to a sudden attack, it is possible that your fingerprint has been disclosed. Please reset your finger gun control debate immediately." Dylan Tweney, Venture Beat, has updated one of Apple presentations to add an element that has obviously been forgotten.
These remarks with a lot of imagination and rigging above picture illustrates a general fear: what will happen if the mechanism Apple even announced gun control debate as encrypted and locked, compromised? What will happen to the biometric data of individuals? A memorial factor as a password can be reset. gun control debate But what about the cases involving personal factor such as fingerprints, iris of the eye, facial recognition or tone of voice?
Reflections on the website, the informatic